- Disregard for safety rules does not automatically justify discharge - February 2, 2021
- Seeking legal advice can help firms minimize risk, stay focused - January 15, 2021
- Duty to mitigate more important than a ‘sense of entitlement’ - December 16, 2020
The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in Fraser v Canada deals with the effects of pension regulations on women employed by the RCMP and appears to expand the legal test for discrimination. I recently discussed this case at the Law Society of Ontario’s Ninth Annual Human Rights Summit.
RCMP members participate in a contributory pension plan and receive pension credit for time worked, with full-time hours attracting higher pension contributions than part-time hours. A contributor who experiences a gap in service because of a leave of absence or suspension of employment can participate in a “buy-back” process, requiring that member to retroactively cover the employee and employer portions of contributions during the leave period. For more, click here.
Pingback: Duty to mitigate more important than a ‘sense of entitlement’ | LegalMattersCanada