Latest posts by Rishi Bandhu (see all)
- Disregard for safety rules does not automatically justify discharge - February 2, 2021
- Seeking legal advice can help firms minimize risk, stay focused - January 15, 2021
- Duty to mitigate more important than a ‘sense of entitlement’ - December 16, 2020
The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Manthadi v. ASCO Manufacturing is a timely reminder to employers and lawyers about the possible consequences of a business sale and a lesson about the importance of employment contracts.
In a nutshell, the ruling illustrates that there isn’t a fixed rule with asset purchase transactions regarding an employer’s obligations to long-serving employees. It also is a warning that business purchasers who simply assume that they are not going to inherit the service of those employees without a written employment agreement do so at their own peril. For more click here.
Pingback: A job title is not always the ticket to more severance in a dismissal | LegalMattersCanada