When rape is alleged, our courts should not rush to judgment

The British Columbia Court of Appeal recently ordered a new trial for one of my appellant clients convicted of sexual assault, in an important appeal which chips away at R. v. W.D. – the standard “credibility assessment” case which sets rigid rules for determining credibility in a she-said/he-said confrontation.

Sexual assault is always a serious matter, but often in such cases, the presumption of innocence becomes a joke, with the benefit of the doubt invariably favouring the complainant–especially when that person is a young female. To read more, click here.